The Election Crime Bureau published a stunning central library of election findings (visit the Evidence tab). They identify 10 main “Attack Vectors” through which election outcomes are shaped or shielded from scrutiny. Each of the 800+ findings from past elections supports President Trump’s assertions that our elections can be stolen – and were in 2020.

The 42 subcategories (domains) span every critical layer of our election infrastructure. This collection of open-source intelligence (OSINT) is the best we’ve ever seen. Many of the categories are rarely discussed in public, such as Cartel Funding, Privileged Access, and Willful Neglect. Note: The Federal government has access to even more evidence.

The depth of the project proves we can no longer think of election corruption as local or regional issues conducted by ignorant officials or bad actors. It must be treated as a national security threat. When serious issues arise, a coordinated national effort should be undertaken rather than relying on local groups that need to quickly find volunteers.

Patrick Colbeck, a highly experienced tech engineer and former MI Senator, authored much of the evidence. He said, “Our election systems have been designated as critical infrastructure. In this light, any attempt to undermine our election system should be viewed as an attack. Military planners divide warfare into several domains – land, sea, air, cyber, and space. The notion of attack vectors with elections takes a similar approach.”

In election security, an “attack vector” is the path or method used to compromise an election. Think of it as the route of attack, rather than the attack itself. The person carrying out the attack is known at the “threat actor”, and the actual exploitation event is considered the “attack”.

All of the findings include “Citations” that reference the source of information that supports that evidence. These are links to court cases, reports, and other necessary documents or articles. With more complex topics, exceptional graphics are provided to further help the readers, investigators, or law enforcement.

Over 550 of the findings are rated as “Established Fact” and provide strong evidence. Some findings are rated “Reasonable Inference”. These are logically drawn conclusions that a rational person would make from the evidence. A select few are rated “Disputed Fact”, which is a polite way of saying “We think you’re lying”.

For instance, after Maricopa County received a legislative subpoena, they ran a script 37,686 times purging their EMS election logs. They claimed this purge was standard election procedure (Disputed Fact). It was later learned that this process was never performed in any previous election. It was NOT standard procedure.

Privatized Operations (Vector 07) – This is one of the more interesting. It highlights the displacement of publicly accountable election officials with private vendors, consultants, and NGO networks. Behind the scenes, they control key aspects of an election and operate outside normal transparency, FOIA, and conflict of interest safeguards. They can influence ballot handling, tabulation processes, and election night operations.

Weaponization of Government (Vector 08) – These findings establish a pattern where multiple state and federal agencies directed their authority not towards neutral administration of election law, but towards shielding the 2020 election from scrutiny. They suppressed lawful challenges and retaliated against those concerned. This was not isolated incompetence or bureaucratic delay.

This “weaponization” evidence reflects coordinated and multi-channel obstruction: Denial and destruction of election records instead of lawful compliance with FOIA. Issuing directives that exceeded statutory authority. Deploying prosecutors towards whistleblowers and election-integrity litigants. The deliberate channeling of federal election-fraud complaints away from independent investigators.

The Election Crime Bureau website also breaks down findings by location. Within the United States, they have over 500 findings in the five states of AZ, GA, MI, PA, and WI. The countries of China, Serbia, Iran, and Venezuela have nearly 60 findings of evidence.

This library shows that the theft of elections involves much more than illegal voters, machines, and drop boxes. The theft of the 2020 election was a grand conspiracy that involved information control, financing, foreign interference, privatized operations not subject to public oversight, corrupt election officials, and sedition.

This collection of information was a team effort. The website mentions contributions by the #MeddlingKids, who are some of the best and brightest working on election integrity and other conservative causes. That list of names can be seen in the X post below. The overall project and ECB website are part of Mike Lindell’s nationwide efforts to help fix our elections. We would like to thank Mr. Lindell and all those who contributed to the project.

A comprehensive report of these findings was provided to federal investigators. In some cases, it recommends specific investigations, including search warrants. To ensure the integrity of these investigations, this report has not been released to the public. It would likely tip off the scum bags.

Patrick Colbeck: “If it weren’t for #MeddlingKids and so many others, they would have gotten away with all of their fraud – election, Medicaid, etc. Thank you and many others for giving meddling kids a voice! As for those of you in the media who sought to silence their voices? Shame on you.”

If it weren’t for #MeddlingKids such as @DataRepublican, @nickshirleyy, @BobCushman1776, @PeterBernegger, @PatriotMarkCook, @FSociety_1942, @DrazhaS, @PatrickByrne, @hoopes_leah, @theprofsrecord, @realtinapeters, @AttyStefLambert, @SidneyPowell1, @RudyGiuliani, @mifairelections,… https://t.co/n58eANybzU

— Patrick Colbeck (@pjcolbeck) December 29, 2025

The post New Library of Election Evidence “Attack Vectors” — Election Crime Bureau Provides 800+ Findings In 42 Categories appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.