Guest Post by Attorney Peter Tictin and Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D.

We have developed a methodology that can provide indisputable proof, well before Election Day, that in the upcoming November midterm elections, the United States Postal Service (USPS) is in the process of delivering mail-in ballots to hundreds of thousands of illegal locations (i.e., addresses that are not domiciles of registered voters). The result will be enough fraudulent votes will be counted for the Democratic Party to gain a majority in the House and possibly in the Senate as well.

The detection methodology uses an AI computer model that compares time-series snapshots of state voter rolls with USPS “Change of Address” data and county property tax records to flag addresses that cannot legally house a voter. A continuously updated database of every parcel and structure drawn from roughly 3,200 county property rolls, integrated with building permit data, determines the USPS regularly delivers mail-in ballots to addresses not classified as a residential domicile (i.e., the address is a vacant building or an empty lot that has no bedroom facilities).

The computer model also demonstrates that the USPS regularly delivers mail-in ballots illegally to bulk-drop addresses, including local U.S. post office boxes, FedEx locations, UPS offices, and other “virtual mailbox locations.” These locations are anomalous voter registrations because they obviously are not residential addresses if they are receiving mail-in ballots in bunches. Instead, these virtual mailbox locations are ideal for illegal bulk drop-offs of mail-in ballots, designed to be picked up, filled out, and returned by locally operating NGOs.

If President Trump ordered the Department of Justice to prohibit the USPS from delivering ballots to addresses deemed “ineligible” by state law, he would stop the 2026 steal in its tracks. If a court tried to enjoin President Trump or the DOJ from doing so, that court would be complicit in allowing the USPS to deliver ballots illegally to addresses the state government defines as ineligible to receive ballots.

Applying the methodology to the Georgia presidential election in 2020 (see: https://rumble.com/v59qdot-who-won-georgia-2020-longer-fractal-video.html), we believe that thousands of mail-in ballots were sent to illegal addresses, including warehouses with no domiciled residents, various business locations, bulk mail addresses, and industrial facilities (e.g., a peanut farm with no residential facilities).

The conclusion is obvious: in detecting voter fraud, addresses are more important than voter ID. The voter ID may tell us that Bill and Sally are registered voters who live at 509 Elmont Street. The critical fault is that we have no information about the address. Addresses don’t move. Addresses don’t change their name. Addresses don’t have lawyers or rights. Addresses contain the most powerful unused data in election analysis.

Every address in America—in often granular detail—is reflected on official property tax rolls that are updated constantly because they are the tax base for the county. Property tax rolls do not reflect residents; they reflect address attributes—like an address with 21 registered voters with one bedroom, one bath, and 1,200 square feet of living space. An ineligible alien can cast one illegal ballot. An ineligible address can collect hundreds of loose ballots, with zero chain of custody—collected by NGOs and voted—and not for Republican candidates.

Posting poll watchers and DOJ attorneys at the voting place completely misses this steal. Once the envelope containing voter information, including address, is removed from the page with the vote, election officials will be unable to collect and disqualify mail-in ballots illegally cast. Because state officials conduct no outreach investigations to verify that mail-in ballots are delivered to, and voted on by, eligible registered voters, the mail-in ballots the USPS delivers to and receives from these anomalous locations are never revealed to be fraudulent.

The solution is simple, clear, inexpensive, and compelling—and the courts cannot intervene, at least not without looking preposterous. Compare the voter roll for each state with the property tax rolls for that state—and focus only on the urban areas. The voter roll tells you five registered voters reside at 330 Bridge Avenue. The property tax roll tells you 330 Bridge Avenue is a coffee shop with no bedrooms or other living accommodations. You just stopped five illegitimate votes from being cast.

Our research has proven that in 2024, the USPS delivered 250,000 mail-in ballots to illegal addresses in each of three states—Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia. In 2004, the USPS delivered mail-in ballots to over 1.25 million illegal addresses in each of two states—Pennsylvania and Texas —plus over 100,000 in Arizona and Nevada. Elections are often won by 17,000 to 25,000 ballots, yet nobody monitors addresses.

The point is that the fraud capable of swinging an election is detected by addresses, not by scrubbing voter registration files. Since it is a crime for the USPS to deliver and receive illegal ballots, the USPS must be stopped from aiding and abetting criminal mail-in ballot harvesting. Policing mail-in voting to prohibit the USPS from delivering mail-in ballots to illegal addresses has a better chance of avoiding politically motivated court challenges since addresses are unlikely to be deemed to have legal status, since addresses are not “persons” under the law. Addresses have no rights, no attorneys, no sob stories in the leftist press about someone not allowed to vote.

If radical leftist insurgents win the battle over the rules under which the 2026 midterm elections are conducted, we risk turning over the Republic to those determined to alter our Constitution beyond recognition. Stimulating turnout to create an election “too big to rig” will not work—not as long as the current mail-in ballot rules remain in place. With close elections decided by one or two percent differences, election fraudsters need only determine how many fraudulent mail-in ballots will be needed to steal the election. With the current mail-in ballot rules, the left is planning to make the 2026 midterm elections into a coup d’état. We will be watching a “Truman Show” psy-op with the population pre-conditioned to support a Democratic Party sweep by rigged polls that show voters willing to elect DSA-supported communis majorities in the House and Senate.

While the time is short, President Trump still has time to issue a National Security Emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA, 1976) to set election rules that will prevent election theft from foreign enemies as well as enemies within. Wayne Allyn Root is right: Every GOP candidate is about to become Spencer Pratt unless Trump acts.

Peter Ticktin, Esq., is a Senior Partner in The Ticktin Law Group in Deerfield Beach, Florida. He is the author of the 2020 book, What Makes Trump Tick: My Years with Donald Trump from New York Military Academy to the Present.  GodsFiveStones.com is a tax-deductible 501(c)3 foundation created by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D., and Karladine Graves, M.D., managed by Capstone Legacy Foundation. As reported on GodsFiveStones.com, As reported on GodsFiveStones.com, Andrew Paquette, Ph.D., has discovered cryptographic algorithms in the State Board of Elections voter registration databases in New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Florida, New Jersey, and Oklahoma. Dr. Paquette has argued that the algorithms permit the creation of millions of false voter records in the state boards of election that are yet given legitimate state Voter IDs for to facilitate clandestine mail-in voter fraud.

 

The post President Trump Has Time to Declare a National Security Emergency to Prevent Election Theft from Enemies Foreign and Domestic appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.