Do British taxpayers have to pay to protect Andrew from the consequences of his actions?
After the deluge of damaging information related to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, his popularity (if we can even call it that) tanked, and he became one of the most hated men in Britain.
That, of course, leads to consequences.
In the violence-filled UK, it was not a surprise when Andrew was confronted by an armed man near his new home in Sandringham.
Now, the disgraced second son of the late Queen Elizabeth wants taxpayer-funded security to protect him.
Andrew feels he is ‘most at risk royal’ – and wants taxy-payers to fund his protection https://t.co/aD58Bwmh3I
— Metro (@MetroUK) June 20, 2026
GB News reported:
“The former prince is said to remain concerned that he is not provided enough protection and feels as though he is more at risk than other royals, who have round-the-clock security.
The concerns grew after he was allegedly confronted by a ‘balaclava-clad’ man near his Sandringham Estate home.”
Norfolk Police arrested a man called Alex Jenkinson, due to stand trial on July 29.
Jenkinson has pleaded not guilty to using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behavior towards Andrew, but did plead guilty to ‘failing to provide a specimen of blood while in custody’.
“A source close to Mr. Mountbatten-Windsor told The Telegraph: ‘This is a clear demonstration of the fact that you cannot un-invent a member of the Royal family. Regardless of the fact that Mr. Mountbatten-Windsor has had his titles removed and is no longer a working royal, he still continues to face security threats. There is just as much of a risk to him from fixated individuals as there is to any active members of the Royal Family, if not more so because of all the publicity surrounding him’.”
Read more:
The post Disgraced Former Prince Andrew Demands British Taxpayer-Funded Security Detail After Confrontation With Balaclava-Clad Attacker appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.