Minnesota lawmaker Leigh Finke discusses age verification for adult content, arguing it can be educational for queer youth during a legislative session.

Minnesota lawmaker Leigh Finke discusses age verification for adult content, arguing it can be educational for queer youth during a legislative session.

When you hear about so-called “trans rights” what they really mean is they want the ability to mutilate innocent children and show minors graphic pornography.

According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, “Consumption of pornography is associated with many negative emotional, psychological, sociological, and physical health outcomes. These include increased rates of depression, anxiety, acting out and violent behavior, younger age of sexual debut, sexual promiscuity, increased risk of teen pregnancy, child sex abuse, sexual trafficking, and a distorted view of relationships between men and women.”

The Gateway Pundit reported,

In a contentious hearing at the Minnesota State Capitol on Thursday, Democratic State Representative Leigh Finke, the state’s first openly transgender legislator, voiced strong opposition to a bill requiring age verification for websites containing material harmful to minors, claiming porn can be “educational” for queer kids.
Finke argued that such restrictions could block access to “educational” content for queer children.

House File 1434 (HF 1434), introduced by Republican Rep. Ben Bakeberg, aims to protect minors from explicit online content by mandating age verification on websites where at least one-third of the material appeals to a “prurient interest” in nudity, sex, or excretion, or depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way.

The bill defines “harmful to minors” based on standards lacking serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for youth.

It would allow the state Attorney General to enforce and create a private right of action for parents or guardians to sue noncompliant sites for up to $10,000 per violation, plus actual damages and attorney’s fees.

Finke claimed that the vague definition of “prurient interest” could be interpreted to include “the very existence of transgender kids.”

The representative also claimed attorneys general in other states with similar laws are “almost jubilant” about using them to ban children from accessing material that “could be educational if they are queer.”

Reports indicate that children in America are being exposed to pornography at shockingly young ages.

This is not “educational” it is evil.

The post Victor Reacts: THIS Is What They Mean by “Trans Rights” (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.